PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGME vs. KNCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGME vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 63.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed KNCT with an annualized return of 10.45%, while KNCT has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.


GGME

1D
-0.32%
1M
12.63%
YTD
7.37%
6M
5.66%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.45%

KNCT

1D
-0.63%
1M
26.38%
YTD
63.41%
6M
62.53%
1Y
99.38%
3Y*
43.36%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
21.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGME vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
7.37%16.39%32.67%23.76%-36.43%10.68%36.26%20.28%1.97%7.61%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
63.41%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GGME and KNCT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.72

The correlation between GGME and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGME vs. KNCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GGME
KNCT

Technology

56.5%
80.8%

Communication Services

40.1%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%

-

Industrials

0.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.3%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GGME
56.5%
KNCT
80.8%

Communication Services

GGME
40.1%
KNCT
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GGME
3.0%
KNCT

-

Industrials

GGME
0.4%
KNCT
1.1%

Financial Services

GGME
0.3%
KNCT
0.2%

Basic Materials

GGME

-

KNCT

-

Consumer Defensive

GGME

-

KNCT

-

Energy

GGME

-

KNCT

-

Healthcare

GGME

-

KNCT

-

Real Estate

GGME

-

KNCT
4.1%

Utilities

GGME

-

KNCT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGME vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGME
GGME Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGME vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGMEKNCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.76

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

10.00

-9.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

44.01

-42.81

GGME vs. KNCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the KNCT Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and KNCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGMEKNCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

4.70

-3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.94

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.94

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.58

-0.24

Drawdowns

GGME vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than KNCT's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and KNCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMEKNCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-57.18%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-9.99%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-21.40%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-34.55%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.35%

-34.55%

-11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-0.63%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-10.74%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

2.27%

+8.95%

Volatility

GGME vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 5.12%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGMEKNCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

9.19%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

17.12%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

21.28%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

23.19%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

22.97%

+0.17%

GGME vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGME vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than KNCT's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
0.12%0.17%0.08%2.31%0.76%0.39%0.38%0.50%0.93%0.33%0.16%1.11%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGME and KNCT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to GGME (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs KNCT's -57.18%.

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.42% vs 10.45% for GGME. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.12% for GGME.

GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGME and KNCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer