PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGME vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGME vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 10.45%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.


GGME

1D
-0.32%
1M
12.63%
YTD
7.37%
6M
5.66%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.45%

IDGT

1D
-1.58%
1M
8.43%
YTD
53.90%
6M
49.82%
1Y
63.37%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGME vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
7.37%16.39%32.67%23.76%-36.43%10.68%36.26%20.28%1.97%7.61%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
53.90%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GGME and IDGT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.71

The correlation between GGME and IDGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GGME vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GGME
IDGT

Technology

56.5%
60.7%

Communication Services

40.1%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

34.3%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GGME
56.5%
IDGT
60.7%

Communication Services

GGME
40.1%
IDGT
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GGME
3.0%
IDGT

-

Industrials

GGME
0.4%
IDGT

-

Financial Services

GGME
0.3%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

GGME

-

IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

GGME

-

IDGT

-

Energy

GGME

-

IDGT

-

Healthcare

GGME

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

GGME

-

IDGT
34.3%

Utilities

GGME

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGME vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGME
GGME Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGME vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGMEIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.52

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

7.54

-7.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

22.58

-21.37

GGME vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGMEIDGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

3.13

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.58

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.18

+0.16

Drawdowns

GGME vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMEIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-77.95%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-8.45%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-23.74%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-35.83%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.35%

-36.88%

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.58%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-19.91%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

2.81%

+8.41%

Volatility

GGME vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 5.12%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGMEIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

7.87%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

16.35%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

20.41%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

23.20%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

23.29%

-0.15%

GGME vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGME vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IDGT's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
0.12%0.17%0.08%2.31%0.76%0.39%0.38%0.50%0.93%0.33%0.16%1.11%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGME and IDGT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to GGME (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.38% vs 10.45% for GGME. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.38% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.12% for GGME.

GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGME and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer