PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGLL vs. METD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GGLL vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGLL vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
-13.29%123.07%5.91%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
10.80%-17.33%-15.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLL achieves a -13.29% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 10.80% return.


GGLL

1D
6.92%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-13.29%
6M
35.38%
1Y
197.12%
3Y*
61.49%
5Y*
10Y*

METD

1D
-1.30%
1M
11.22%
YTD
10.80%
6M
19.37%
1Y
-7.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GGLL vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GGLL vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

METD
METD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLL vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGLLMETDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

-0.19

+3.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

0.01

+3.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.00

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

-0.23

+5.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.61

-0.31

+19.92

GGLL vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLL Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the METD Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLL and METD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGLLMETDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

-0.19

+3.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

-0.37

+1.17

Correlation

The correlation between GGLL and METD is -0.49. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

GGLL vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than METD's 2.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
5.26%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%
METD
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF
2.46%3.35%2.30%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GGLL vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLL drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLL and METD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GGLLMETDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.81%

-46.03%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.39%

-39.89%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.39%

-28.79%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.51%

-28.04%

+12.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

29.16%

-18.64%

Volatility

GGLL vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a higher volatility of 19.62% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 13.60%. This indicates that GGLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GGLLMETDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.62%

13.60%

+6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.89%

26.77%

+13.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.32%

40.32%

+21.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.21%

36.25%

+18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.21%

36.25%

+18.96%