GGLL vs. METD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGLL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%), while METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. GGLL is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. Over the past year, GGLL returned 293.20% vs 6.23% for METD. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. GGLL charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

GGLL vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLL achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than METD's 6.12% return.

GGLL

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -13.22%
• YTD: 22.24%
• 6M: 15.91%
• 1Y: 293.20%
• 3Y*: 65.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 4.24%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGLL vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	22.24%	123.07%	5.91%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	6.12%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GGLL and METD is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	-0.48

Return for Risk

GGLL vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 94
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 11
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 13
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLL vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGLL	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.07	0.18	+4.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.96	0.49	+4.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.07	+0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.69	0.09	+7.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.53	0.20	+26.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGLL vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLL Sharpe Ratio is 5.07, which is higher than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLL and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGLL	METD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.07	0.18	+4.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	-0.39	+1.38

Drawdowns

GGLL vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLL drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLL and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGLL	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.81%	-46.03%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.39%	-24.38%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.02%	-31.79%	+10.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-28.60%	+13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.11%	11.30%	-0.19%

Volatility

GGLL vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 7.69%. This indicates that GGLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGLL	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	7.69%	+8.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.70%	26.69%	+14.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.40%	35.52%	+22.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.03%	36.33%	+19.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.03%	36.33%	+19.70%

GGLL vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGLL vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than METD's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	3.73%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.57%	3.35%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGLL and METD in my portfolio?

GGLL and METD have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGLL or METD?

GGLL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to METD (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLL dropped -52.81% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, GGLL or METD?

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 293.20% vs 6.23% for METD. On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGLL or METD?

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 293.20% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGLL or METD?

METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGLL or METD?

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 2.57% for METD.

What is the main difference between GGLL and METD?

GGLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while METD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GGLL and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.