PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIZX vs. GIEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than GIEYX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GGIZX has underperformed GIEYX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while GIEYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.


GGIZX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.13%
YTD
5.18%
6M
5.57%
1Y
13.68%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
6.33%

GIEYX

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6.18%
6M
7.68%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
5.18%12.49%8.34%12.32%-15.60%6.94%10.66%17.36%-4.88%12.31%
GIEYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund
6.18%28.09%6.71%18.38%-16.02%9.60%7.78%23.50%-15.08%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and GIEYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.83

The correlation between GGIZX and GIEYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. GIEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GIEYX
GIEYX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GIEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GIEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIZXGIEYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.31

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.20

4.91

+5.29

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the GIEYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and GIEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIZXGIEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.06

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.31

+0.22

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum GIEYX drawdown of -64.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and GIEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIZXGIEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-64.13%

+28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-11.52%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-13.31%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-29.72%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-36.30%

+14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.46%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-15.35%

+10.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

3.07%

-1.74%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) is 2.23%, while GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that GGIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIZXGIEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

4.36%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.44%

11.69%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

14.23%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

15.38%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

16.55%

-7.86%

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GIEYX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIZX vs. GIEYX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than GIEYX's 9.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.81%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%
GIEYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund
9.77%10.37%8.78%3.98%1.98%8.37%1.02%5.15%14.06%8.55%2.87%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GGIZX and GIEYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GIEYX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to GGIZX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs GIEYX's -64.13%.

GGIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIZX and GIEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer