PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIZX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 0.11% return.


GGIZX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.94%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.74%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
6.39%

GFSYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.96%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
5.35%12.49%8.34%12.32%-15.60%6.94%10.66%17.36%-4.88%4.23%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
0.11%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and GFSYX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017

0.19

The correlation between GGIZX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIZXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.02

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

4.27

+6.50

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIZXGFSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.10

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.27

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.89

-0.36

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIZXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-9.54%

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-1.34%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-4.49%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-4.49%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-0.91%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.65%

+0.67%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.92%. This indicates that GGIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIZXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

0.92%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.43%

1.95%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.70%

2.54%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

3.67%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

3.72%

+4.97%

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIZX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than GFSYX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
7.17%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.80%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGIZX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGIZX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to GFSYX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

GGIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIZX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer