PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIZX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than FYMIX's 9.38% return.


GGIZX

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.95%
YTD
4.85%
6M
5.24%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
6.34%

FYMIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.11%
YTD
9.38%
6M
10.23%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
4.85%12.49%8.34%12.32%-12.23%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
9.38%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and FYMIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.95

The correlation between GGIZX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIZXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.71

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

11.73

-1.51

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIZXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.21

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.66

-0.13

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIZXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-22.70%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-8.80%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-12.72%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.69%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-5.64%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.03%

-0.70%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) is 2.26%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that GGIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIZXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.60%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.43%

8.88%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

10.81%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.40%

12.73%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

12.73%

-4.04%

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIZX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, more than FYMIX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.37%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.84%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GGIZX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYMIX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GGIZX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIZX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer