GGINX vs. FGIYX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) and FGIYX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GGINX returned 10.62%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for FGIYX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGINX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FGIYX.

Performance

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGINX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGIYX's 12.82% return.

GGINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: —

FGIYX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 12.66%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 15.84%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	11.73%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	12.82%	18.08%	10.91%	8.90%	-6.10%	14.85%	-2.55%	36.57%	-7.70%	19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GGINX and FGIYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.94

The correlation between GGINX and FGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGINX vs. FGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FGIYX

FGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGINX	FGIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.75	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.43	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.03	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	9.54	-1.79

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGINX and FGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGINX drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum FGIYX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGINX and FGIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGINX	FGIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-49.18%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-5.99%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-12.49%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.21%	-20.92%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.45%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-7.02%	+1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.89%	+0.10%

Volatility

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGINX	FGIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	3.42%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.74%	8.60%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	10.41%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	13.20%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	15.29%	+3.67%

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGINX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIYX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGINX vs. FGIYX - Dividend Comparison

GGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than FGIYX's 14.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	14.73%	10.28%	7.74%	2.51%	6.41%	7.48%	1.62%	12.32%	6.62%	6.10%	8.64%	3.31%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.00%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGINX and FGIYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GGINX and FGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGINX or FGIYX?

GGINX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FGIYX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGINX dropped -35.80% vs FGIYX's -49.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.