GGINX vs. AIFRX
GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) and AIFRX (abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GGINX returned 10.55%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for AIFRX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GGINX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AIFRX.
Performance
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGINX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than AIFRX's 13.24% return.
GGINX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
AIFRX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 11.09% | 15.18% | 28.43% | 5.00% | -8.51% | 16.49% | -3.81% | 31.50% | -8.99% | 11.75% |
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 13.24% | 26.92% | 2.88% | 13.10% | -7.95% | 15.61% | 1.87% | 28.41% | -9.31% | 25.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGINX and AIFRX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GGINX and AIFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGINX vs. AIFRX — Risk / Return Rank
GGINX
AIFRX
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGINX | AIFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.16 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | 10.65 | -3.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGINX drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum AIFRX drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGINX and AIFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGINX | AIFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -38.38% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -6.42% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -12.40% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -22.75% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -1.85% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -5.43% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.90% | +0.27% |
Volatility
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) at 2.89%. This indicates that GGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGINX | AIFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 2.89% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 8.49% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 10.38% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 14.00% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 15.76% | +3.15% |
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGINX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AIFRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGINX vs. AIFRX - Dividend Comparison
GGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than AIFRX's 6.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.98% | 7.80% | 8.13% | 3.46% | 4.86% | 5.31% | 3.45% | 4.01% | 3.96% | 3.80% | 4.37% | 4.55% |
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.16% | 6.26% | 30.25% | 2.67% | 0.89% | 1.86% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.98% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGINX and AIFRX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGINX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to AIFRX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGINX dropped -35.80% vs AIFRX's -38.38%.
AIFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGINX and AIFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer