PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIFX vs. FBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIFX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FBLTX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GGIFX has outperformed FBLTX with an annualized return of 1.17%, while FBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.68% annualized return.


GGIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
1.17%

FBLTX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
-6.17%
10Y*
-1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIFX
Victory INCORE Fund for Income
0.45%4.28%4.04%4.01%-5.47%-1.74%2.78%3.85%0.96%0.40%
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.08%4.39%-8.05%2.71%-31.84%-4.89%18.27%14.36%-1.24%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIFX and FBLTX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2015

0.59

The correlation between GGIFX and FBLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIFX vs. FBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIFX
GGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLTX
FBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIFXFBLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.09

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

0.67

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

1.71

+10.49

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the FBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIFX and FBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIFXFBLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.53

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.39

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

-0.12

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

-0.05

+1.24

Drawdowns

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIFX drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum FBLTX drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIFX and FBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIFXFBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-49.06%

+39.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-7.66%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-19.12%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.39%

-44.19%

+35.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.08%

-49.06%

+39.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-41.01%

+40.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-20.99%

+19.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

3.01%

-2.74%

Volatility

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory INCORE Fund for Income (GGIFX) is 0.57%, while Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that GGIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIFXFBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

2.80%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.25%

6.56%

-5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

9.82%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.54%

15.70%

-13.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.27%

14.59%

-12.32%

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLTX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIFX vs. FBLTX - Dividend Comparison

GGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than FBLTX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.17%4.04%3.60%3.29%2.25%1.81%6.73%2.39%2.87%2.68%3.70%0.39%
GGIFX
Victory INCORE Fund for Income
4.92%4.21%5.33%5.39%5.40%4.99%4.61%5.13%5.59%5.21%5.22%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGIFX and FBLTX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLTX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to GGIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIFX dropped -9.08% vs FBLTX's -49.06%.

GGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIFX and FBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer