PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBLTX vs. ZROZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBLTX achieves a -3.37% return, which is significantly higher than ZROZ's -7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FBLTX has outperformed ZROZ with an annualized return of -2.52%, while ZROZ has yielded a comparatively lower -5.40% annualized return.


FBLTX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.63%
6M
-3.28%
YTD
-3.37%
1Y
-2.17%
3Y*
-2.29%
5Y*
-8.31%
10Y*
-2.52%
ALL TIME*
-1.05%

ZROZ

1D
-1.24%
1M
-7.20%
6M
-6.41%
YTD
-7.23%
1Y
-7.54%
3Y*
-8.06%
5Y*
-14.47%
10Y*
-5.40%
ALL TIME*
1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$41.31M$45.82M$40.38M

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-3.37%4.39%-8.05%2.71%-31.84%-4.89%18.27%14.36%-1.24%9.06%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
-7.23%-1.84%-16.18%1.19%-41.28%-5.22%24.57%21.22%-5.43%14.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FBLTX and ZROZ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2015

0.98

The correlation between FBLTX and ZROZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBLTX vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBLTX
FBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ZROZ
ZROZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ZROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ZROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBLTXZROZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

-0.39

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

-0.82

+0.71

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBLTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the ZROZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBLTX and ZROZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBLTX drawdown since its inception was -49.06%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBLTX and ZROZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBLTXZROZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.06%

-62.93%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-14.90%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-26.42%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.19%

-57.98%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.06%

-62.93%

+13.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.95%

-62.42%

+19.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-24.38%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

7.18%

-3.64%

Volatility

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) is 2.48%, while PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FBLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBLTXZROZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

4.20%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

11.11%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

15.45%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

23.76%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

21.96%

-7.45%

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBLTX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FBLTX vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison

FBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than ZROZ's 5.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.97%4.04%3.60%3.29%2.25%1.81%6.73%2.39%2.87%2.68%3.70%0.39%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
5.59%4.96%4.58%3.52%2.76%1.60%1.68%2.22%2.06%2.53%3.00%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FBLTX and ZROZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ZROZ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FBLTX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBLTX dropped -49.06% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.

FBLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBLTX and ZROZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer