PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGHCX vs. FACDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGHCX achieves a -7.49% return, which is significantly lower than FACDX's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GGHCX has underperformed FACDX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while FACDX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.


GGHCX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
-9.37%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
6.18%

FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
-7.49%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GGHCX and FACDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996

0.87

The correlation between GGHCX and FACDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGHCX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGHCXFACDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.16

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

1.09

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

2.96

-1.94

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGHCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FACDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGHCX and FACDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGHCXFACDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

0.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.10

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.43

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

0.00

Drawdowns

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGHCX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum FACDX drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGHCX and FACDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGHCXFACDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-44.55%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-13.43%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-17.49%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-29.35%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.34%

-29.35%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-9.14%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-9.35%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

4.93%

+0.87%

Volatility

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) is 4.40%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that GGHCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGHCXFACDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.08%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

12.11%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

15.85%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

17.90%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

18.78%

-1.33%

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGHCX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGHCX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison

GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than FACDX's 14.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
6.15%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGHCX and FACDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FACDX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to GGHCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGHCX dropped -40.23% vs FACDX's -44.55%.

FACDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGHCX and FACDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer