GFSIX vs. HLFNX
GFSIX (Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund) and HLFNX (Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, GFSIX returned 17.72%/yr vs 5.26%/yr for HLFNX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GFSIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for HLFNX.
Performance
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFSIX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly higher than HLFNX's -0.54% return.
GFSIX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HLFNX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFSIX Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund | 6.63% | 36.58% | 28.17% | 25.77% | -11.12% | 29.11% | -1.28% | 9.12% | 0.39% |
HLFNX Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund | -0.54% | 22.07% | 28.45% | 4.58% | -24.88% | 18.96% | 16.55% | 29.75% | -16.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFSIX and HLFNX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between GFSIX and HLFNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFSIX vs. HLFNX — Risk / Return Rank
GFSIX
HLFNX
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) and Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFSIX | HLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.72 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 1.76 | +8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFSIX drawdown since its inception was -46.39%, smaller than the maximum HLFNX drawdown of -71.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSIX and HLFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFSIX | HLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.39% | -71.74% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -18.44% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -24.02% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.07% | -44.03% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -4.78% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -21.26% | +13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 7.53% | -4.65% |
Volatility
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) is 3.60%, while Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that GFSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLFNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFSIX | HLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.30% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 14.67% | -5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 19.84% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 23.92% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 24.21% | -2.48% |
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFSIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFNX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFSIX vs. HLFNX - Dividend Comparison
GFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than HLFNX's 7.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFSIX Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 2.96% | 2.11% | 1.58% | 2.69% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HLFNX Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund | 7.96% | 7.92% | 0.56% | 1.72% | 7.39% | 5.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.15% | 4.60% | 0.54% | 10.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFSIX and HLFNX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLFNX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GFSIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFSIX dropped -46.39% vs HLFNX's -71.74%.
GFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFSIX and HLFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer