GFSDX vs. SLMCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GFSDX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S) and SLMCX (Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund) are both mutual funds - GFSDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while SLMCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past year, GFSDX returned 19.78% vs 122.34% for SLMCX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GFSDX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for SLMCX.

Performance

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFSDX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 53.04% return.

GFSDX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: 19.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLMCX

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 11.55%
• YTD: 53.04%
• 6M: 51.13%
• 1Y: 122.34%
• 3Y*: 45.86%
• 5Y*: 25.72%
• 10Y*: 27.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S	7.12%	15.83%	-2.40%
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund	53.04%	37.32%	-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GFSDX and SLMCX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.52

The correlation between GFSDX and SLMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GFSDX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFSDX

GFSDX Risk / Return Rank: 64
GFSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GFSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GFSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GFSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GFSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SLMCX

SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 97
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFSDX	SLMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	4.82	-2.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	5.05	-1.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.68	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	9.96	-6.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	38.58	-24.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 4.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFSDX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFSDX	SLMCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	4.82	-2.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.72	+0.37

Drawdowns

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFSDX drawdown since its inception was -13.02%, smaller than the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSDX and SLMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFSDX	SLMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.02%	-68.10%	+55.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.51%	-12.33%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	0.00%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-13.00%	+11.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	3.18%	-1.72%

Volatility

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) is 2.34%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that GFSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFSDX	SLMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	6.59%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	19.85%	-12.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.06%	25.93%	-16.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.92%	26.17%	-13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.92%	26.11%	-13.19%

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFSDX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFSDX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

GFSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than SLMCX's 6.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S	5.04%	5.34%	4.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund	6.18%	9.45%	14.27%	5.16%	9.42%	11.75%	10.40%	11.44%	12.33%	11.15%	8.19%	10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFSDX and SLMCX in my portfolio?

GFSDX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFSDX or SLMCX?

SLMCX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to GFSDX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFSDX dropped -13.02% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.82 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.