GFSDX vs. FGIPX
GFSDX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GFSDX returned 19.78% vs 44.15% for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GFSDX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.
Performance
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFSDX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 16.97% return.
GFSDX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGIPX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 16.97%
- 6M
- 22.45%
- 1Y
- 44.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S | 7.12% | 15.83% | -2.40% |
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 16.97% | 30.18% | -3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFSDX and FGIPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GFSDX and FGIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFSDX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank
GFSDX
FGIPX
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFSDX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 3.95 | -1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.19 | 5.47 | -2.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.71 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 6.25 | -2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 24.04 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFSDX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.95 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.74 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFSDX drawdown since its inception was -13.02%, smaller than the maximum FGIPX drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSDX and FGIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFSDX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.02% | -37.32% | +24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.51% | -7.26% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | 0.00% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -4.18% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.89% | -0.43% |
Volatility
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) is 2.34%, while Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that GFSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFSDX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 2.74% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 8.20% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.06% | 11.40% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 14.89% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 17.12% | -4.20% |
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFSDX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFSDX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison
GFSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than FGIPX's 10.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 10.10% | 11.68% | 12.69% | 7.50% | 7.35% | 12.20% | 2.13% | 52.72% | 25.63% | 5.58% | 4.22% | 5.88% |
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S | 5.04% | 5.34% | 4.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFSDX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGIPX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to GFSDX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFSDX dropped -13.02% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.
FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFSDX and FGIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer