GFOF vs. VSOL
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and VSOL (VanEck Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while VSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by VanEck. GFOF is passively managed, while VSOL is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VSOL.
Performance
GFOF vs. VSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSOL
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- -14.43%
- YTD
- -40.84%
- 6M
- -47.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. VSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSOL VanEck Solana ETF | -40.84% | -4.01% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. VSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and VanEck Solana ETF (VSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | VSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.90 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. VSOL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | VSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -50.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -50.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.83% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. VSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | VSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 72.67% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 72.67% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 72.67% | — |
GFOF vs. VSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VSOL's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. VSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFOF nor VSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
VSOL VanEck Solana ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, VSOL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VSOL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
GFOF and VSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while VSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.30% for VSOL.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and VSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer