PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFOF vs. STCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFOF vs. STCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFOF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STCE

1D
-2.15%
1M
3.34%
YTD
28.85%
6M
18.77%
1Y
80.72%
3Y*
54.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. STCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%60.08%145.49%-48.93%
STCE
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF
28.85%36.12%41.76%108.65%-40.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GFOF and STCE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2022

0.67

The correlation between GFOF and STCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

GFOF vs. STCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GFOF
STCE

Financial Services

57.4%
69.0%

Technology

22.8%
26.3%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

GFOF
57.4%
STCE
69.0%

Technology

GFOF
22.8%
STCE
26.3%

Healthcare

GFOF
8.5%
STCE

-

Industrials

GFOF
3.4%
STCE

-

Basic Materials

GFOF

-

STCE

-

Communication Services

GFOF

-

STCE
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GFOF

-

STCE

-

Consumer Defensive

GFOF

-

STCE

-

Energy

GFOF

-

STCE
0.0%

Real Estate

GFOF

-

STCE

-

Utilities

GFOF

-

STCE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFOF vs. STCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


STCE
STCE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
STCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
STCE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
STCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
STCE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFOF vs. STCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFOFSTCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

GFOF vs. STCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFOF vs. STCE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFOFSTCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.56%

Volatility

GFOF vs. STCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFOFSTCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.01%

GFOF vs. STCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than STCE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFOF vs. STCE - Dividend Comparison

GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%2.55%4.08%0.00%
STCE
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF
1.52%1.96%0.64%0.31%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFOF and STCE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STCE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STCE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

STCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while STCE tracks Schwab Crypto Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.30% for STCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFOF and STCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer