GFOF vs. QBF
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both Blockchain funds. GFOF is passively managed, while QBF is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.
Performance
GFOF vs. QBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBF
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -23.63%
- 6M
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -23.63% | -14.22% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
QBF
GFOF vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.97 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -42.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -42.92% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.82% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.20% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | QBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.36% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 28.53% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 28.53% | — |
GFOF vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison
GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.81% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GFOF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFOF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.79% for QBF.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and QBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer