PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFOF vs. MNRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFOF vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFOF

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MNRS

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.83%
6M
5.31%
YTD
20.57%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$334.32K$247.38K$543.60K

GFOF vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
20.57%14.05%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFOF vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MNRS
MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFOF vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFOFMNRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

GFOF vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFOF vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFOFMNRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.98%

Volatility

GFOF vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFOFMNRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.67%

GFOF vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFOF vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%2.55%4.08%
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
0.45%0.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.59% for MNRS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFOF and MNRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer