GFOF vs. MNRS
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Blockchain funds from Grayscale - GFOF tracks the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index while MNRS tracks the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.
Performance
GFOF vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNRS
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 35.90%
- YTD
- 66.15%
- 6M
- 40.56%
- 1Y
- 129.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 66.15% | 12.66% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
MNRS
GFOF vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.85 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -56.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -8.42% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.73% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.93% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 70.28% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 70.50% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 70.50% | — |
GFOF vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison
GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.33% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.59% for MNRS.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and MNRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer