PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFOF vs. ETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFOF vs. ETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GFOF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETH

1D
-5.52%
1M
-23.42%
YTD
-38.95%
6M
-42.17%
1Y
-30.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%33.80%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
-38.95%-10.89%-3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GFOF and ETH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFOF vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFOF

ETH
ETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFOF vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GFOF vs. ETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFOFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

Drawdowns

GFOF vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFOFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.50%

Volatility

GFOF vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFOFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.26%

GFOF vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFOF vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFOF nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
0.00%0.00%2.55%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFOF and ETH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

GFOF and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while ETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.15% for ETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFOF and ETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer