GFOF vs. ETH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and ETH (Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while ETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale. GFOF is passively managed, while ETH is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETH.

Performance

GFOF vs. ETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETH

• 1D: -4.13%
• 1M: -19.44%
• YTD: -43.73%
• 6M: -43.65%
• 1Y: -27.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	29.28%
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF	-43.73%	-10.89%	-4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GFOF and ETH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

GFOF vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETH

ETH Risk / Return Rank: 6
ETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ETH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFOF vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFOF	ETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.98	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.69	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GFOF	ETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.19%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-67.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-65.34%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.50%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFOF	ETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	69.05%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	72.37%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	72.37%	—

GFOF vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFOF vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFOF nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFOF and ETH in my portfolio?

GFOF and ETH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GFOF or ETH?

On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFOF or ETH?

ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFOF or ETH?

GFOF and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GFOF and ETH?

GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while ETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.15% for ETH.