GFOF vs. BTCC
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while BTCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale. GFOF is passively managed, while BTCC is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for BTCC.
Performance
GFOF vs. BTCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -15.87%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -22.94%
- 1Y
- -33.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. BTCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -20.81% | -6.34% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. BTCC — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
BTCC
GFOF vs. BTCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.72 | — |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. BTCC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -39.44% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.87% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. BTCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 32.92% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 31.68% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 31.68% | — |
GFOF vs. BTCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCC's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. BTCC - Dividend Comparison
GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 105.03% | 63.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTCC is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCC is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while BTCC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.66% for BTCC.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and BTCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer