GFOF vs. BTC
GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while BTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale. GFOF is passively managed, while BTC is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BTC.
Performance
GFOF vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- -17.80%
- YTD
- -28.84%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- 1Y
- -39.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 49.97% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -28.84% | -7.50% | 41.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFOF and BTC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTC
GFOF vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFOF | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -51.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -51.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -50.40% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.66% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.52% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.23% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 48.26% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 48.26% | — |
GFOF vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFOF vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFOF nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFOF and BTC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
GFOF and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while BTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.15% for BTC.
Find the right allocation for GFOF and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer