GFIRX vs. EQCHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GFIRX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and EQCHX (AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GFIRX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for EQCHX.

Performance

GFIRX vs. EQCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GFIRX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 0.58%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: 3.28%

EQCHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFIRX vs. EQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund	7.48%	0.54%	-5.17%	-3.87%	20.44%	4.86%	6.94%	2.61%	-2.24%	2.56%
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.83%	-8.09%	-3.79%	-8.07%	20.13%	12.28%	6.96%	-2.56%	-12.91%	15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIRX and EQCHX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.62

The correlation between GFIRX and EQCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GFIRX vs. EQCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFIRX

GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 67
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFIRX vs. EQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFIRX	EQCHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFIRX	EQCHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GFIRX	EQCHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.93%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFIRX	EQCHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.75%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.39%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.06%	—	—

GFIRX vs. EQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIRX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EQCHX's 1.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFIRX vs. EQCHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFIRX nor EQCHX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.82%	1.54%	20.40%	0.00%	3.86%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	20.11%	7.35%	1.21%	7.06%	0.16%	0.49%	0.00%	3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFIRX and EQCHX in my portfolio?

GFIRX and EQCHX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.