GFIRX vs. AMFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX).
GFIRX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. AMFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.43% | 0.54% | -5.17% | -3.87% | 20.44% | 4.86% | 6.94% | 2.61% | -2.24% | 2.56% |
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 6.43% | -9.75% | -3.56% | -10.59% | 35.38% | 3.28% | 13.29% | 8.03% | -12.87% | 6.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFIRX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMFAX's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIRX has outperformed AMFAX with an annualized return of 2.35%, while AMFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.
GFIRX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
AMFAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- -3.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFIRX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFAX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFIRX vs. AMFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GFIRX
AMFAX
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFIRX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.15 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.27 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.08 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 0.13 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFIRX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.15 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.12 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.28 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFIRX and AMFAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Dividend Comparison
GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.11% | 7.35% | 1.21% | 7.06% | 0.16% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 3.98% |
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 1.73% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.30% | 32.70% | 5.74% | 3.14% | 4.71% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFIRX drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum AMFAX drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIRX and AMFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFIRX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -36.84% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.37% | -13.54% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.09% | -36.84% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.09% | -36.84% | +13.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.09% | -25.04% | +12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -13.54% | +6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 8.79% | -6.91% |
Volatility
GFIRX vs. AMFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) is 3.28%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that GFIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFIRX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.94% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.24% | 10.02% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 13.06% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 13.68% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 12.67% | -3.63% |