PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMFAX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMFAX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AMFAX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


AMFAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.21%
6M
5.30%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
-3.53%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
1.77%
ALL TIME*
3.55%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFAX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
9.45%-9.75%-3.56%-10.59%35.38%3.28%13.29%8.03%-12.87%6.54%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AMFAX and MBXIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMFAX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMFAX
AMFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AMFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMFAXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.88

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

14.92

-7.34

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMFAX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMFAX drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFAX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMFAXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.84%

-31.73%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-3.85%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.49%

-15.59%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.84%

-15.59%

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.84%

-31.73%

-5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.92%

-2.68%

-20.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-3.95%

-9.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.04%

+1.52%

Volatility

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that AMFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMFAXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

1.59%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

4.89%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

6.90%

+5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

11.40%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

13.36%

-0.63%

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMFAX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMFAX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFAX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.68%1.84%1.28%0.30%32.70%5.74%3.14%4.71%1.31%0.00%0.00%4.92%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMFAX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMFAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFAX dropped -36.84% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMFAX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer