PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFGF vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFGF vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFGF vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
-10.95%13.11%26.12%24.03%-1.20%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
6.82%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -10.95% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.82% return.


GFGF

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-10.95%
6M
-6.60%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
10Y*

THLV

1D
1.01%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
6.82%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFGF vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GFGF vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGF
GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFGFTHLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.79

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

2.50

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

3.15

-2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

11.39

-10.33

GFGF vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGF and THLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFGFTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.79

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.86

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and THLV is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GFGF vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than THLV's 1.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
0.24%0.21%0.10%0.08%0.42%0.01%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.66%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and THLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFGFTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-13.15%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-6.66%

-8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.71%

-4.37%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-3.75%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

1.84%

+2.21%

Volatility

GFGF vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.55%. This indicates that GFGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFGFTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

3.55%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

7.61%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

11.31%

+5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

11.80%

+7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

11.80%

+7.53%