PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFFFX vs. LTEBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) and American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (LTEBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFFFX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than LTEBX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GFFFX has outperformed LTEBX with an annualized return of 16.07%, while LTEBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


GFFFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.32%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.82%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
16.07%

LTEBX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.49%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%
LTEBX
American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
0.93%6.02%1.97%3.82%-5.12%-0.01%4.01%4.67%1.08%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GFFFX and LTEBX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

-0.07

The correlation between GFFFX and LTEBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFFFX vs. LTEBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LTEBX
LTEBX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LTEBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTEBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTEBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LTEBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTEBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) and American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (LTEBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFFFXLTEBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.75

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.15

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.19

6.62

+0.57

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the LTEBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFFFX and LTEBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFFFXLTEBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.77

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.78

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.47

-0.67

Drawdowns

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFFFX drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than LTEBX's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFFFX and LTEBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFFFXLTEBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-8.33%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-2.33%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-2.91%

-18.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.26%

-8.33%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-8.33%

-27.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.93%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-1.06%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

0.75%

+2.76%

Volatility

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (LTEBX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GFFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTEBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFFFXLTEBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

0.71%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

1.47%

+10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

1.81%

+13.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

2.32%

+17.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

2.34%

+17.34%

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFFFX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LTEBX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFFFX vs. LTEBX - Dividend Comparison

GFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than LTEBX's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.00%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%
LTEBX
American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
2.59%3.39%2.34%1.74%0.87%1.24%1.92%2.19%2.04%2.21%1.92%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFFFX and LTEBX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFFFX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to LTEBX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFFFX dropped -36.26% vs LTEBX's -8.33%.

LTEBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFFFX and LTEBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer