LTEBX vs. JPLD
LTEBX (American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund) and JPLD (JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both funds - LTEBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by American Funds, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, LTEBX returned 4.51% vs 4.19% for JPLD. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTEBX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.
Performance
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTEBX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 1.08% return.
LTEBX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
JPLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LTEBX American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | 0.80% | 6.02% | 1.97% | 2.68% |
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | 1.08% | 6.01% | 6.49% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTEBX and JPLD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTEBX vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank
LTEBX
JPLD
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (LTEBX) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTEBX | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.59 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 4.19 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 19.07 | -13.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTEBX drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTEBX and JPLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTEBX | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -1.17% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | -1.00% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.28% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -0.15% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.22% | +0.56% |
Volatility
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (LTEBX) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) have volatilities of 0.54% and 0.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTEBX | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.48% | 1.05% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81% | 1.48% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.32% | 1.84% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 1.84% | +0.50% |
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTEBX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTEBX vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison
LTEBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than JPLD's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.24% | 4.47% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTEBX American Funds Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund | 2.59% | 3.39% | 2.34% | 1.74% | 0.87% | 1.24% | 1.92% | 2.19% | 2.04% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTEBX and JPLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPLD has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to LTEBX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTEBX dropped -8.33% vs JPLD's -1.17%.
JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTEBX and JPLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer