GFFFX vs. ANEFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFFFX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2) and ANEFX (American Funds The New Economy Fund) are both mutual funds - GFFFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while ANEFX is a Global Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, GFFFX returned 16.52%/yr vs 17.50%/yr for ANEFX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GFFFX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ANEFX.

Performance

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund (ANEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFFFX achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than ANEFX's 24.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GFFFX has underperformed ANEFX with an annualized return of 16.52%, while ANEFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.50% annualized return.

GFFFX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 7.92%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 16.52%

ANEFX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 24.01%
• 6M: 24.30%
• 1Y: 52.62%
• 3Y*: 31.04%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: 17.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2	8.83%	19.96%	28.28%	37.51%	-30.61%	19.55%	38.16%	28.43%	-2.96%	26.38%
ANEFX American Funds The New Economy Fund	24.01%	31.01%	23.58%	29.14%	-29.67%	12.85%	33.47%	26.46%	-4.36%	34.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GFFFX and ANEFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.96

The correlation between GFFFX and ANEFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GFFFX vs. ANEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFFFX

GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 30
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ANEFX

ANEFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
ANEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ANEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ANEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ANEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ANEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund (ANEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFFFX	ANEFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.90	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.62	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.50	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	4.06	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	17.54	-10.76

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the ANEFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFFFX and ANEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFFFX drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum ANEFX drawdown of -61.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFFFX and ANEFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFFFX	ANEFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-61.28%	+25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.74%	-13.35%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.55%	-20.82%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.26%	-36.63%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.26%	-36.63%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	0.00%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-11.43%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	3.08%	+0.50%

Volatility

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) is 6.79%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund (ANEFX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that GFFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFFFX	ANEFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	8.30%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	15.32%	-2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	18.69%	-2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	19.68%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.78%	19.27%	+0.51%

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFFFX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ANEFX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFFFX vs. ANEFX - Dividend Comparison

GFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than ANEFX's 8.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANEFX American Funds The New Economy Fund	8.01%	9.93%	9.59%	3.96%	0.00%	8.24%	2.47%	7.34%	10.00%	8.28%	4.61%	6.16%
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2	10.06%	10.95%	9.23%	7.64%	4.32%	8.42%	4.51%	7.38%	12.29%	7.27%	6.87%	9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFFFX and ANEFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GFFFX and ANEFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GFFFX or ANEFX?

ANEFX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to GFFFX (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFFFX dropped -36.26% vs ANEFX's -61.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.