GFEB vs. SCHX
GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the NONE, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFEB returned 13.04%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
GFEB vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFEB achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
GFEB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
GFEB vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 5.83% | 11.19% | 13.06% | 13.76% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 21.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFEB and SCHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GFEB and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GFEB vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GFEB
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GFEB
SCHX
Financial Services
GFEB
SCHX
Communication Services
GFEB
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
GFEB
SCHX
Healthcare
GFEB
SCHX
Industrials
GFEB
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
GFEB
SCHX
Energy
GFEB
SCHX
Utilities
GFEB
SCHX
Real Estate
GFEB
SCHX
Basic Materials
GFEB
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFEB vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
GFEB
SCHX
GFEB vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFEB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.41 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.05 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.40 | 13.85 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFEB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.29 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.85 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
GFEB vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFEB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -34.33% | +24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.46% | -9.02% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.63% | -19.04% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.70% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -3.97% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.98% | -1.15% |
Volatility
GFEB vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) is 0.91%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that GFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFEB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 2.91% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 9.02% | -4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.51% | 11.99% | -6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 17.12% | -9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 18.15% | -10.58% |
GFEB vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFEB vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
GFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GFEB and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to GFEB (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFEB dropped -9.63% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 22.38% vs 13.04% for GFEB. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GFEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 22.38% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GFEB.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for GFEB.
GFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. GFEB tracks NONE, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GFEB and 0.03% for SCHX.
GFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFEB and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer