GFEB vs. DIVN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GFEB (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and DIVN (Horizon Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the NONE, while DIVN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. GFEB is passively managed, while DIVN is actively managed. Over the past year, GFEB returned 13.44% vs 22.46% for DIVN. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DIVN.

Performance

GFEB vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEB achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.73% return.

GFEB

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 5.89%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 1Y: 13.44%
• 3Y*: 12.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.96%

DIVN

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 7.52%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 1Y: 22.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	$11.52M	$5.71M	$2.75M
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February	$442.36K	$554.58K	$432.73K

GFEB vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February	7.10%	7.42%
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	14.73%	8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GFEB and DIVN is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

GFEB vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFEB

GFEB Risk / Return Rank: 89
GFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DIVN

DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 86
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFEB vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFEB	DIVN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.18	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.35	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.39	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	4.06	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.91	11.43	+4.49

GFEB vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEB and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFEB vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and DIVN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFEB	DIVN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-5.55%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.46%	-5.55%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.45%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-1.35%	+0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	1.97%	-1.12%

Volatility

GFEB vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) is 1.51%, while Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that GFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFEB	DIVN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	3.04%	-1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	7.52%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.63%	10.36%	-4.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.50%	10.51%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.50%	10.51%	-3.01%

GFEB vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFEB vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

GFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.

Position	TTM	2025
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	3.70%	1.47%
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFEB and DIVN in my portfolio?

GFEB and DIVN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFEB or DIVN?

DIVN has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to GFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFEB dropped -9.63% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

Which ETF is better, GFEB or DIVN?

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.46% vs 13.44% for GFEB. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GFEB or DIVN?

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.46% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFEB or DIVN?

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFEB or DIVN?

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for GFEB.

What is the main difference between GFEB and DIVN?

GFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GFEB and 0.70% for DIVN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.