GEW vs. TRTY
GEW (Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF) and TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while TRTY is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Cambria Trinity Index. GEW is actively managed, while TRTY is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GEW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRTY.
Performance
GEW vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GEW having a 7.16% return and TRTY slightly lower at 6.95%.
GEW
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GEW vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 7.16% | 3.68% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 6.95% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEW and TRTY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEW vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank
GEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRTY
GEW vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF (GEW) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEW | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEW vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEW drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum TRTY drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEW and TRTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEW | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -22.35% | +14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -3.47% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -4.14% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility
GEW vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEW | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 10.01% | +4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 10.60% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 10.42% | +4.08% |
GEW vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEW vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison
GEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than TRTY's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 1.27% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 2.96% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEW and TRTY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TRTY.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.27% for GEW.
GEW is categorized as Global Equities, while TRTY is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GEW and 0.44% for TRTY.
Find the right allocation for GEW and TRTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer