GEW vs. DRIV
GEW (Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GEW is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GEW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
GEW vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEW achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 13.15% return.
GEW
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 42.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $934.15K | $1.60M | $2.79M | |
| $7.37K | $7.45K | $148.22K |
GEW vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 9.33% | 3.68% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 13.15% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEW and DRIV is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEW vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
GEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRIV
GEW vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF (GEW) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEW | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEW vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEW drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEW and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEW | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -41.93% | +33.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.29% | +21.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -15.09% | +13.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility
GEW vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEW | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 29.45% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 27.92% | -13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 27.76% | -13.73% |
GEW vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEW vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
GEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than DRIV's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.66% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEW and DRIV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
GEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.66% for DRIV.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GEW and 0.68% for DRIV.
Find the right allocation for GEW and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer