GEV vs. HWM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GEV (GE Vernova Inc.) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past year, GEV returned 93.31% vs 54.66% for HWM. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GEV vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEV achieves a 44.12% return, which is significantly higher than HWM's 29.23% return.

GEV

• 1D: 3.74%
• 1M: -11.47%
• YTD: 44.12%
• 6M: 40.23%
• 1Y: 93.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HWM

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 29.23%
• 6M: 33.60%
• 1Y: 54.66%
• 3Y*: 79.69%
• 5Y*: 50.00%
• 10Y*: 33.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEV vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	44.12%	99.02%	186.24%
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.	29.23%	87.95%	62.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GEV and HWM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.50

Fundamentals

Market Cap GEV : $255.86B HWM : $106.66B
EPS GEV : $34.12 HWM : $4.31
PE Ratio GEV : 27.57 HWM : 61.42
PEG Ratio GEV : 0.13 HWM : 1.04
PS Ratio GEV : 6.56 HWM : 12.42
PB Ratio GEV : 18.38 HWM : 19.32
Total Revenue (TTM) GEV : $39.38B HWM : $8.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEV : $7.85B HWM : $2.81B
EBITDA (TTM) GEV : $3.32B HWM : $2.66B

Return for Risk

GEV vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEV

GEV Risk / Return Rank: 88
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

HWM

HWM Risk / Return Rank: 85
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEV vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEV	HWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.75	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.51	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	3.46	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.27	9.77	+1.50

GEV vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEV and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GEV vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEV and HWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEV	HWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	-88.30%	+50.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.57%	-15.89%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.17%	-3.26%	-14.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-31.00%	+24.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.31%	5.61%	+2.70%

Volatility

GEV vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 11.03%. This indicates that GEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEV	HWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.17%	11.03%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.45%	25.03%	+9.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.09%	31.46%	+17.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.62%	32.20%	+21.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.62%	39.82%	+13.80%

Dividends

GEV vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

GEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than HWM's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	0.16%	0.11%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.31%	0.25%	0.13%	0.05%	0.39%	1.42%	0.88%	40.49%	1.22%

Financials

GEV vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GE Vernova Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 9.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

GEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

GEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a net income of 4.75B and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in a net margin of 50.8%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEV and HWM in my portfolio?

GEV and HWM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GEV or HWM?

GEV has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to HWM (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEV dropped -38.29% vs HWM's -88.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.