PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEV vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEV vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEV achieves a 50.00% return, which is significantly higher than EMXC's 42.50% return.


GEV

1D
4.08%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
50.00%
6M
43.89%
1Y
105.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMXC

1D
3.83%
1M
10.65%
YTD
42.50%
6M
47.59%
1Y
74.22%
3Y*
27.88%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEV vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
50.00%99.02%186.24%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
42.50%35.14%-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GEV and EMXC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEV vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEV vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEVEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

5.18

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

19.92

-7.31

GEV vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEV and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEV vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEV and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEVEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-42.81%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.57%

-14.41%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-0.45%

-14.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-10.17%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

3.74%

+4.62%

Volatility

GEV vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) have volatilities of 13.60% and 13.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEVEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.60%

13.30%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.53%

22.16%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.28%

24.16%

+25.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.63%

18.08%

+35.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.63%

20.10%

+33.53%

Dividends

GEV vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

GEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than EMXC's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.56%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.15%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEV and EMXC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEV has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to EMXC (13.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEV dropped -38.29% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEV and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer