PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GERM vs. SWAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GERM vs. SWAN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN).

GERM and SWAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GERM is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. It was launched on Jun 17, 2020. SWAN is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2018. Both GERM and SWAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GERM vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GERM vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF		-3.42%13.93%1.53%

Returns By Period

GERM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

SWAN

1D
0.17%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
-2.41%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
9.92%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

Often compared with GERM:
GERM vs. SBIOGERM vs. EQRRGERM vs. GDOCGERM vs. MDEVGERM vs. ARKGGERM vs. BTECGERM vs. MNY.TO
Often compared with SWAN:
SWAN vs. NTSXSWAN vs. SPYSWAN vs. FTLSSWAN vs. USSGSWAN vs. IHGSWAN vs. JEPISWAN vs. TLT

GERM vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.

GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

Return for Risk

GERM vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GERM
SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERM vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GERM vs. SWAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GERMSWANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.13

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.23

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.49

—

Dividends

GERM vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison

GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF		3.04%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%

Drawdowns

GERM vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SWAN drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and SWAN.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GERMSWANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-31.04%

+31.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-7.05%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-31.04%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.02%

+5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.06%

+9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.86%

-1.86%

Volatility

GERM vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GERMSWANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.05%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

6.85%

-6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

9.77%

-9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.26%

-11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.49%

-12.49%