GERM vs. MHIP
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GERM is passively managed, while MHIP is actively managed. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MHIP.
Performance
GERM vs. MHIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MHIP
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. MHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% |
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF | 0.14% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. MHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GERM vs. MHIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MHIP drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and MHIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.09% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.47% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.28% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
GERM vs. MHIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | MHIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 11.54% | -11.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 11.54% | -11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 11.54% | -11.54% |
GERM vs. MHIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than MHIP's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. MHIP - Dividend Comparison
Neither GERM nor MHIP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MHIP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MHIP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.
GERM and MHIP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Milliman. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.55% for MHIP.
Find the right allocation for GERM and MHIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer