GERM vs. IBBQ
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - GERM tracks the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index while IBBQ tracks the NASDAQ / Biotechnology. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 39.72% for IBBQ. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for IBBQ.
Performance
GERM vs. IBBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBBQ
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 39.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. IBBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 1.91% | 33.32% | -7.98% |
GERM vs. IBBQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GERM
IBBQ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GERM
IBBQ
Financial Services
GERM
IBBQ
Basic Materials
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Communication Services
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Defensive
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Energy
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Industrials
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Real Estate
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Technology
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Utilities
GERM
-
IBBQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. IBBQ — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
IBBQ
GERM vs. IBBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GERM | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.16 | — |
Drawdowns
GERM vs. IBBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IBBQ drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and IBBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -37.94% | +37.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -8.34% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.17% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -16.82% | +16.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.54% | -2.54% |
Volatility
GERM vs. IBBQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBBQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.84% | -6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 15.14% | -15.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.63% | -19.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.86% | -21.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.86% | -21.86% |
GERM vs. IBBQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IBBQ's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. IBBQ - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.87% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBBQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs IBBQ's -37.94%.
On 1-year performance, IBBQ leads with 39.72% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBBQ has performed better with a 39.72% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.
IBBQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while IBBQ tracks NASDAQ / Biotechnology. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.00% for IBBQ.
Find the right allocation for GERM and IBBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer