GERM vs. BAGY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while BAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. GERM is passively managed, while BAGY is actively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs -37.04% for BAGY. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BAGY.

Performance

GERM vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GERM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAGY

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -20.28%
• YTD: -21.90%
• 6M: -24.70%
• 1Y: -37.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GERM vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	-21.90%	-8.88%

GERM vs. BAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GERM	BAGY
Healthcare	99.3%	-
Financial Services	0.4%	26.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GERM vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGY

BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERM vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GERM	BAGY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.66	—

Drawdowns

GERM vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -47.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and BAGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GERM	BAGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-47.52%	+47.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-47.52%	+47.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-45.06%	+45.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-19.61%	+19.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	26.28%	-26.28%

Volatility

GERM vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GERM	BAGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	9.89%	-9.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	33.39%	-33.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	41.93%	-41.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	40.86%	-40.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	40.86%	-40.86%

GERM vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GERM vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison

GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.25%.

Position	TTM	2025
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	58.25%	30.16%
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, GERM or BAGY?

BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs BAGY's -47.52%.

Which ETF is better, GERM or BAGY?

On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GERM or BAGY?

Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GERM or BAGY?

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GERM or BAGY?

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

What is the main difference between GERM and BAGY?

GERM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.65% for BAGY.