PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GERM vs. AGNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GERM vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GERM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGNG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-4.79%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
8.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GERM vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
-4.79%20.01%-5.85%

GERM vs. AGNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GERM
AGNG

Healthcare

99.3%
90.8%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

9.2%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

GERM
99.3%
AGNG
90.8%

Financial Services

GERM
0.4%
AGNG

-

Basic Materials

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Communication Services

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Consumer Defensive

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Energy

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Industrials

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Real Estate

GERM

-

AGNG
9.2%

Technology

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Utilities

GERM

-

AGNG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GERM vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GERM

AGNG
AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERM vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GERM vs. AGNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GERMAGNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

Drawdowns

GERM vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AGNG drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and AGNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GERMAGNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-30.58%

+30.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-11.45%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.09%

+11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.95%

+5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.20%

-4.20%

Volatility

GERM vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GERMAGNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.87%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

10.00%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

13.62%

-13.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

15.22%

-15.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.13%

-17.13%

GERM vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GERM vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison

GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
0.92%0.88%0.83%0.96%0.49%0.72%0.36%0.83%1.00%1.04%0.45%
GERM
Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNG has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs AGNG's -30.58%.

On 1-year performance, AGNG leads with 9.81% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.50% for AGNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GERM and AGNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer