PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEQZX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEQZX achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 2.67% return.


GEQZX

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.15%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
14.25%
ALL TIME*
9.04%

GFSYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.10%
6M
3.25%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
8.74%16.77%24.53%26.17%-19.99%27.94%17.85%31.34%-4.74%9.22%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
2.67%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GEQZX and GFSYX is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017

0.23

The correlation between GEQZX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEQZX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEQZX
GEQZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GEQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEQZXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.84

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

12.21

-4.04

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEQZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEQZX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEQZX drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQZX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEQZXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-9.54%

-46.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-1.34%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-4.49%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

-4.49%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

0.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-0.90%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

0.53%

+1.57%

Volatility

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.70%. This indicates that GEQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEQZXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

0.70%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

1.93%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

2.55%

+10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

3.67%

+13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

3.70%

+14.42%

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEQZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEQZX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

GEQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than GFSYX's 6.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
1.16%1.35%3.58%3.71%1.12%3.05%2.13%2.02%1.79%1.94%1.42%1.67%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
6.99%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEQZX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEQZX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GFSYX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEQZX dropped -55.67% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

GFSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEQZX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer