GENZ vs. YCS
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GENZ returned 3.13%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for YCS. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
GENZ vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, GENZ has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 3.13%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
GENZ
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.85%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.71K | $66.66K | $80.30K | |
| $1.53M | $2.43M | $1.42M |
GENZ vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -8.92% | 4.15% | -1.39% | 11.52% | -12.83% | -4.30% | 12.72% | 30.17% | -26.79% | 41.11% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and YCS is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | 0.10 |
The correlation between GENZ and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
YCS
GENZ vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENZ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.35 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 8.93 | -9.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -49.56% | -21.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -8.30% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | -23.05% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.93% | -27.32% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | -27.32% | -29.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -5.68% | -22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -19.75% | -4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 2.64% | +13.44% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 5.30%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 5.30% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.84% | 11.65% | +6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 16.85% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 21.16% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 18.61% | +6.54% |
GENZ vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.66% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to YCS (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.76% vs 3.13% for GENZ. On fees, GENZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GENZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer