GENZ vs. CSHP
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GENZ is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GENZ returned -13.86% vs 4.04% for CSHP. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
GENZ vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 2.38% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.85%
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.53M | $7.29M | $2.60M | |
| $64.71K | $66.66K | $80.30K |
GENZ vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -8.92% | 4.15% | 0.27% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 2.38% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
CSHP
GENZ vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENZ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 2.68 | -1.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 10.40 | -10.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 65.72 | -66.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -0.39% | -70.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -0.39% | -26.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -0.27% | -28.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -0.01% | -24.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.08% | 0.06% | +16.02% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 1.10%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 1.10% | +6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.84% | 1.12% | +16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 1.14% | +19.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 0.86% | +23.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 0.86% | +24.29% |
GENZ vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than CSHP's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.89% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.66% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to CSHP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs CSHP's -0.39%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 4.04% vs -13.86% for GENZ. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 4.04% return vs -13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.66% for GENZ.
GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer