PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENZ vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENZ vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -15.11% return, which is significantly lower than CRTC's 8.59% return.


GENZ

1D
-2.34%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-15.11%
6M
-15.40%
1Y
-7.41%
3Y*
-5.47%
5Y*
-7.13%
10Y*
2.44%

CRTC

1D
-1.08%
1M
4.98%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.79%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENZ vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF
-15.11%4.15%-1.39%7.87%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
8.59%18.69%18.05%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GENZ and CRTC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023

0.53

The correlation between GENZ and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

GENZ vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GENZ
CRTC

Financial Services

29.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

29.1%
16.0%

Technology

20.6%
33.5%

Consumer Cyclical

20.2%
6.3%

Industrials

0.9%
14.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

7.1%

Healthcare

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

6.0%

Financial Services

GENZ
29.3%
CRTC
0.2%

Communication Services

GENZ
29.1%
CRTC
16.0%

Technology

GENZ
20.6%
CRTC
33.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GENZ
20.2%
CRTC
6.3%

Industrials

GENZ
0.9%
CRTC
14.1%

Basic Materials

GENZ

-

CRTC
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

GENZ

-

CRTC
0.0%

Energy

GENZ

-

CRTC
7.1%

Healthcare

GENZ

-

CRTC
14.1%

Real Estate

GENZ

-

CRTC
0.1%

Utilities

GENZ

-

CRTC
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENZ vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENZ
GENZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GENZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GENZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENZ vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GENZCRTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.32

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.64

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

9.88

-10.40

GENZ vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENZ and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GENZCRTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.87

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

1.36

-1.31

Drawdowns

GENZ vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENZCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-19.07%

-52.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-9.05%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.35%

-1.27%

-32.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-2.13%

-22.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.22%

2.41%

+11.81%

Volatility

GENZ vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENZCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.20%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

9.64%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

12.76%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

15.73%

+8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

15.73%

+9.38%

GENZ vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENZ vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CRTC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
1.00%1.03%1.13%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GENZ
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF
3.93%3.34%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENZ and CRTC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENZ has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs -7.41% for GENZ. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs -7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.

GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 1.00% for CRTC.

GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.35% for CRTC.

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENZ and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer