GENZ vs. CRTC
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GENZ tracks the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GENZ returned -7.41% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
GENZ vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -15.11% return, which is significantly lower than CRTC's 8.59% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -15.11%
- 6M
- -15.40%
- 1Y
- -7.41%
- 3Y*
- -5.47%
- 5Y*
- -7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
CRTC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENZ vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -15.11% | 4.15% | -1.39% | 7.87% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 8.59% | 18.69% | 18.05% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and CRTC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between GENZ and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
GENZ vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GENZ
CRTC
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GENZ
CRTC
Communication Services
GENZ
CRTC
Technology
GENZ
CRTC
Consumer Cyclical
GENZ
CRTC
Industrials
GENZ
CRTC
Basic Materials
GENZ
-
CRTC
Consumer Defensive
GENZ
-
CRTC
Energy
GENZ
-
CRTC
Healthcare
GENZ
-
CRTC
Real Estate
GENZ
-
CRTC
Utilities
GENZ
-
CRTC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
CRTC
GENZ vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENZ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.64 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 9.88 | -10.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENZ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 1.87 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.36 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -19.07% | -52.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -9.05% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.35% | -1.27% | -32.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -2.13% | -22.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.22% | 2.41% | +11.81% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 3.20% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 9.64% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.01% | 12.76% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 15.73% | +8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 15.73% | +9.38% |
GENZ vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CRTC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.93% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and CRTC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs CRTC's -19.07%.
On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs -7.41% for GENZ. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs -7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.
GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 1.00% for CRTC.
GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.35% for CRTC.
CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer