GENZ vs. BILZ
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. GENZ is passively managed, while BILZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GENZ returned -3.98%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for BILZ. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
GENZ vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than BILZ's 1.87% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- 6M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -5.74%
- 1Y
- -11.43%
- 3Y*
- -3.98%
- 5Y*
- -3.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENZ vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -5.74% | 4.15% | -1.39% | -4.61% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.87% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and BILZ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
BILZ
GENZ vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENZ | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -117.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 44.45 | -43.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 195.90 | -196.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 1,861.89 | -1,862.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -0.52% | -70.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -0.02% | -26.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | -0.17% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | 0.00% | -25.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -0.01% | -24.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 0.00% | +15.58% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 0.07% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 0.15% | +16.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 0.21% | +19.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 0.52% | +24.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 0.52% | +24.54% |
GENZ vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than BILZ's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.02% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.54% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and BILZ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs BILZ's -0.52%.
On 3-year performance, BILZ leads with 4.64% vs -3.98% for GENZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BILZ has performed better with a 4.64% return vs -3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.
BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.54% for GENZ.
GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.14% for BILZ.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.46 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer