GENZ vs. BENJ
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon. GENZ is passively managed, while BENJ is actively managed. Over the past year, GENZ returned -6.52% vs 3.78% for BENJ. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BENJ.
Performance
GENZ vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly lower than BENJ's 1.46% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -13.07%
- 6M
- -12.16%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- -4.39%
- 5Y*
- -6.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
BENJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENZ vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -13.07% | 5.79% |
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 1.46% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and BENJ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
BENJ
GENZ vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENZ | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 4.95 | -3.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 9.71 | -9.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 45.83 | -46.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENZ | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 5.65 | -6.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 6.41 | -6.35 |
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and BENJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -0.39% | -70.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -0.39% | -26.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.75% | -0.01% | -31.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -0.02% | -24.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.28% | 0.08% | +14.20% |
Volatility
GENZ vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.07%. This indicates that GENZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 0.07% | +5.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 0.23% | +14.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 0.67% | +18.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 0.60% | +23.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 0.60% | +24.51% |
GENZ vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.84% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and BENJ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENZ has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to BENJ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs BENJ's -0.39%.
On 1-year performance, BENJ leads with 3.78% vs -6.52% for GENZ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BENJ has performed better with a 3.78% return vs -6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.
GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.
GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.40% for BENJ.
BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.65 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and BENJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer