GENE.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GENE.L (UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GENE.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while TDGB.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GENE.L returned 8.55%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GENE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.

Performance

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GENE.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENE.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.

GENE.L

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: 12.36%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: —

TDGB.L

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 6M: 11.81%
• 1Y: 29.32%
• 3Y*: 20.13%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GENE.L UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	3.70%	14.86%	10.70%	11.06%	-1.37%	17.63%	6.95%	16.38%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	8.92%	30.88%	10.65%	9.06%	22.49%	19.59%	-5.61%	10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GENE.L and TDGB.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between GENE.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GENE.L	TDGB.L
Financial Services	26.3%	31.7%
Healthcare	12.8%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	10.1%
Utilities	8.3%	6.2%
Communication Services	7.8%	8.7%
Real Estate	6.8%	0.0%
Basic Materials	5.8%	1.2%
Technology	5.3%	0.3%
Industrials	5.3%	3.9%
Energy	-	19.7%

Return for Risk

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENE.L

GENE.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
GENE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GENE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GENE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GENE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GENE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TDGB.L

TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GENE.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	3.15	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	4.38	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.59	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	6.26	-3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	20.72	-12.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENE.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GENE.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	3.15	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	1.55	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.98	-0.31

Drawdowns

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENE.L drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, roughly equal to the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENE.L and TDGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENE.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	-29.60%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.79%	-4.66%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.04%	-12.41%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.04%	-12.41%	-2.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-1.47%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-3.70%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.41%	+0.56%

Volatility

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENE.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	2.49%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.14%	7.01%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	9.28%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	11.42%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	14.44%	+0.48%

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENE.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

GENE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GENE.L UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	3.20%	3.50%	4.27%	4.93%	4.40%	4.06%	4.16%	4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENE.L and TDGB.L in my portfolio?

GENE.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GENE.L or TDGB.L?

On fees, GENE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENE.L or TDGB.L?

GENE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

What is the main difference between GENE.L and TDGB.L?

GENE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GENE.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.