PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENE.L vs. UB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENE.L achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than UB01.L's 5.77% return.


GENE.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
3.16%
6M
5.74%
1Y
16.56%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*

UB01.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
3.60%
YTD
5.77%
6M
7.24%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GENE.L
UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
3.16%14.86%10.70%11.06%-1.37%17.63%6.95%21.36%-3.99%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
5.77%28.34%6.43%19.85%-4.38%14.47%4.04%16.99%-4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GENE.L and UB01.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.28

Over the past year, GENE.L and UB01.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GENE.L
UB01.L

Financial Services

26.3%
25.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.4%
5.4%

Utilities

8.3%
4.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.5%

Technology

5.3%
17.8%

Industrials

5.3%
21.7%

Energy

-

5.0%

Financial Services

GENE.L
26.3%
UB01.L
25.0%

Healthcare

GENE.L
12.8%
UB01.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GENE.L
11.2%
UB01.L
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

GENE.L
10.4%
UB01.L
5.4%

Utilities

GENE.L
8.3%
UB01.L
4.6%

Communication Services

GENE.L
7.8%
UB01.L
2.4%

Real Estate

GENE.L
6.8%
UB01.L

-

Basic Materials

GENE.L
5.8%
UB01.L
3.5%

Technology

GENE.L
5.3%
UB01.L
17.8%

Industrials

GENE.L
5.3%
UB01.L
21.7%

Energy

GENE.L

-

UB01.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENE.L vs. UB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENE.L
GENE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GENE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GENE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

UB01.L
UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GENE.LUB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.06

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

6.44

+1.95

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the UB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENE.L and UB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GENE.LUB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.45

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.11

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.60

-0.93

Drawdowns

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENE.L drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, roughly equal to the maximum UB01.L drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENE.L and UB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENE.LUB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-29.27%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-11.38%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-13.55%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.04%

-21.12%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-1.19%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-4.21%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.92%

-1.95%

Volatility

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) is 2.61%, while UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that GENE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENE.LUB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

4.83%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

12.85%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

16.16%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

26.82%

-13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

31.16%

-16.23%

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UB01.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GENE.L vs. UB01.L - Dividend Comparison

GENE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB01.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GENE.L
UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.58%2.43%3.13%2.86%2.78%1.94%1.93%3.04%2.77%2.89%3.55%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENE.L and UB01.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GENE.L.

GENE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UB01.L is Europe Equities. GENE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GENE.L and 0.15% for UB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENE.L and UB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer