GEND vs. IBIC
GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEND is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. GEND is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, GEND returned 23.74% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GEND charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
GEND vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEND achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.
GEND
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEND vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 12.06% | 16.84% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEND and IBIC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEND vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
GEND
IBIC
GEND vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEND | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 2.22 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 16.56 | -12.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 58.67 | -45.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEND vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEND | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -0.90% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -0.27% | -6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -0.08% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -0.10% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.08% | +1.70% |
Volatility
GEND vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that GEND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEND | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 0.17% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 0.67% | +7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 0.89% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 1.56% | +12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 1.56% | +12.52% |
GEND vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEND has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEND vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 2.73% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEND and IBIC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEND has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEND dropped -13.31% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, GEND leads with 23.74% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GEND has performed better with a 23.74% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GEND.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.73% for GEND.
GEND is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GEND and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEND and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer