GEME vs. YCS
GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GEME is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Pacific AM, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). GEME is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, GEME returned 82.30% vs 32.82% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. GEME charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
GEME vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEME achieves a 38.52% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.
GEME
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 10.91%
- YTD
- 38.52%
- 6M
- 44.89%
- 1Y
- 82.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
GEME vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 38.52% | 37.35% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEME and YCS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | -0.16 |
The correlation between GEME and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEME vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
GEME
YCS
GEME vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEME | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.35 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.15 | 3.97 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.06 | 12.40 | +11.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEME | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | 1.92 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 0.33 | +2.33 |
Drawdowns
GEME vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEME drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEME and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEME | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -49.56% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.46% | -8.30% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -19.93% | +17.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.66% | +0.77% |
Volatility
GEME vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that GEME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEME | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 2.75% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 12.32% | +5.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.23% | 17.27% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 21.10% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 19.01% | +3.94% |
GEME vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEME has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEME vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
GEME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 5.06% | 7.01% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEME and YCS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEME has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEME dropped -16.86% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 82.30% vs 32.82% for YCS. On fees, GEME is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 82.30% return vs 32.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GEME is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
GEME is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Pacific AM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEME and 1.00% for YCS.
GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEME and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer