GEMD vs. LEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB).
GEMD and LEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GEMD is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets USD Bond Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. LEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both GEMD and LEMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GEMD vs. LEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GEMD vs. LEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | -1.32% | 13.67% | 3.31% | 8.51% | -15.70% |
LEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | -1.40% | 18.02% | -1.72% | 7.23% | -12.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEMD achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly higher than LEMB's -1.40% return.
GEMD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEMB
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 12.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GEMD vs. LEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LEMB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GEMD vs. LEMB — Risk / Return Rank
GEMD
LEMB
GEMD vs. LEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEMD | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.79 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.40 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.02 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 8.47 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEMD | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.79 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.03 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GEMD and LEMB is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GEMD vs. LEMB - Dividend Comparison
GEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than LEMB's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMD Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.55% | 6.32% | 5.79% | 5.70% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 2.48% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.86% | 3.89% | 0.00% | 4.39% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
GEMD vs. LEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEMD drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum LEMB drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMD and LEMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEMD | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -30.82% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -6.00% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -7.30% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -12.83% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 1.43% | -0.30% |
Volatility
GEMD vs. LEMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) is 3.02%, while iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that GEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GEMD | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.20% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | 4.72% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.52% | 6.86% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 8.19% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 9.33% | +0.75% |